It’s the first day of the latest iPhone generation. And, as is the case with every major smartphone launch these days, we have a pretty good notion of what to anticipate from the device. However, the iPhone and Android battle never end! The accuracy of leaks and speculations has improved in recent years. Although there is always the possibility of a major surprise, the most probable scenario is that the iPhone 13 will be precisely what we expect it to be.
However, just because the rumours are unambiguous does not imply that they are uninteresting. This year’s iPhone 13 (we’re assuming that’s the name) will have some new technologies. However, it will be maintaining its current appearance. New designs tend to spur significant update cycles; the case is different for iPhone 13. It is typically the second year of a design that brings forth the most intriguing improvements. So, the iPhone and Android battle this year is pretty interesting.
iPhone and Android Battle
Despite the fact that the specifications may be duplicated, the issue of “experience” remains. Apple is known for not being the first to accomplish anything. But it is for sure known for coming in later with improvements and doing it better than everyone else. That cliche exists because it is often accurate.
Using a Samsung phone in portrait mode for video has been possible since 2019. Trust me when I say that you wouldn’t want to use it for anything essential because of the poor quality. Apple’s, on the other hand, is definitely superior.
Apple has always been late in incorporating a certain piece of technology. I am open to being proven wrong, but I am skeptical that it is feasible to create an always-on lock screen experience that is so incredibly wonderful that every other experience seems broken in comparison. It’s a lock screen that you may take a quick look at!
A phone should be able to offer low-pressure ambient information. This is what marks the conclusion of the iPhone and Android battle. This includes being able to rapidly view the time, date, and a few notification symbols. Variable refresh rates are a bit less helpful, but they are considerably more pleasant to use. They may extend the life of the battery by decreasing the refresh rate. They have the ability to match the refresh rate of the screen to the content (e.g., in a movie).
Furthermore, they may make movements and scrolling seem considerably more fluid. The only noteworthy Apple products that have a high refresh rate, on the other hand, are the company’s top-end iPads. Meanwhile, it is present on every high-end Android phone as well as many mid-range devices.
Competitive Pressure on Apple
I’m honestly perplexed as to why it has taken Apple this long to include such blatantly useful functionality. The most probable reason is that Apple has not felt any competitive pressure to do so. This is the reason why the iPhone and Android battle has always been on the side of Android.
There are a lot of Android phones to select from. Therefore, every manufacturer is acutely aware of the urgent and compelling need to distinguish their products. As a result, even a small feature like an always-on display may make a significant impact on buying choices. However, it is difficult for me to envision someone who would pick an Android phone over an iPhone just because they like to check the clock on their phone.
So, what’s the point of launching a variable refresh rate screen right now?
It’s gotten to the point where it’s a bit embarrassing. Numerous reviews of the iPhone 12 models have pointed out that this feature isn’t available. iOS continues to look and feel slick and quick at 60Hz. However, Android’s move to 120Hz has been a brute force method of catching up in those areas. Switching iOS to run at 120Hz may help Apple gain ground once again. As a result, there is some competitive pressure on Apple; it simply takes a little longer to manifest itself. However, with these advancements, iPhone and Android battle is getting competitive.
I believe that Apple was waiting for component costs to fall and production yields to increase before releasing the iPhone. Both are required due to the scale at which Apple is required to manufacture phones. However, if Apple had faced a bit more competitive pressure, it would have acted more actively!
The battle between Android and Android is a battle of minute differences. However, iPhone and Android battle is something else.
Advances in Android Phones
The point is that there are many little things that iPhone users are losing out on. This is because they are not compelling enough to persuade consumers to make a move to iPhone. Under-screen fingerprint sensors on Android smartphones have gone from average to excellent. Telephoto lenses are folded into periscopes that span the length of the phone. This allows for much greater zooming capabilities than before. Only the tiniest of punch holes for selfie cameras are visible on the screens of smartphones.
The Final Take
If you’re an iPhone user, these are all minor inconveniences. However, they are well worth the sacrifice in exchange for the ecosystem, hardware quality, and performance that you receive. So, suppose there are two new phones on the shop shelf that are virtually identical. You will choose the one that has an always-on screen. Moreover, the iPhone and Android battle majorly depend on user experience and preference!